<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atheism 101: Pascal&#8217;s Wager</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2009/07/atheism-101-pascals-wager/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2009/07/atheism-101-pascals-wager/</link>
	<description>The official site of the Merseyside Skeptics Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrology 101: Debunking The Dirty Dozen &#171;The Merseyside Skeptics Society</title>
		<link>http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2009/07/atheism-101-pascals-wager/comment-page-1/#comment-1576</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrology 101: Debunking The Dirty Dozen &#171;The Merseyside Skeptics Society</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/?p=115#comment-1576</guid>
		<description>[...] and not everyone can be expected to be fully versed in every bit of it.  I&#8217;d never heard of Pascal&#8217;s Wager (as Mike charmingly announced to the world).  People we&#8217;ve spoken to had no idea why [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and not everyone can be expected to be fully versed in every bit of it.  I&#8217;d never heard of Pascal&#8217;s Wager (as Mike charmingly announced to the world).  People we&#8217;ve spoken to had no idea why [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Atherton</title>
		<link>http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2009/07/atheism-101-pascals-wager/comment-page-1/#comment-1551</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Atherton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/?p=115#comment-1551</guid>
		<description>I came in here with a large list of points to make but then i realised that you had already made all of them. The flaw in pascals reasoning has always been that he couldnt due to his beliefs ever take into account that there were more options than just &quot;dont believe in the christian god or do believe in the christian god&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came in here with a large list of points to make but then i realised that you had already made all of them. The flaw in pascals reasoning has always been that he couldnt due to his beliefs ever take into account that there were more options than just &#8220;dont believe in the christian god or do believe in the christian god&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel Molerat</title>
		<link>http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2009/07/atheism-101-pascals-wager/comment-page-1/#comment-1546</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel Molerat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/?p=115#comment-1546</guid>
		<description>Pascal once wagered me £5 that I couldn&#039;t drink him under the table.
Unfortunately, he only agreed to pay once we&#039;re both dead.
Bastard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pascal once wagered me £5 that I couldn&#8217;t drink him under the table.<br />
Unfortunately, he only agreed to pay once we&#8217;re both dead.<br />
Bastard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2009/07/atheism-101-pascals-wager/comment-page-1/#comment-1545</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/?p=115#comment-1545</guid>
		<description>Excellent, concise rebuttal of this claptrap argument.  I&#039;ve met a number of Christians who still pull this one out of one of their orifices and it&#039;s usually the start of much eye rolling on my part...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent, concise rebuttal of this claptrap argument.  I&#8217;ve met a number of Christians who still pull this one out of one of their orifices and it&#8217;s usually the start of much eye rolling on my part&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2009/07/atheism-101-pascals-wager/comment-page-1/#comment-1544</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/?p=115#comment-1544</guid>
		<description>Great article! I always remember Douglas Adams&#039; response to this particular argument:

&quot;People will then often say, ‘But surely it’s better to remain an Agnostic just in case?’ This, to me, suggests such a level of silliness and muddle that I usually edge out of the conversation rather than get sucked into it. (If it turns out that I’ve been wrong all along, and there is in fact a god, and if it further turned out that this kind of legalistic, cross-your-fingers-behind-your-back, Clintonian hair-splitting impressed him, then I think I would choose not to worship him anyway.)  &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! I always remember Douglas Adams&#8217; response to this particular argument:</p>
<p>&#8220;People will then often say, ‘But surely it’s better to remain an Agnostic just in case?’ This, to me, suggests such a level of silliness and muddle that I usually edge out of the conversation rather than get sucked into it. (If it turns out that I’ve been wrong all along, and there is in fact a god, and if it further turned out that this kind of legalistic, cross-your-fingers-behind-your-back, Clintonian hair-splitting impressed him, then I think I would choose not to worship him anyway.)  &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2009/07/atheism-101-pascals-wager/comment-page-1/#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/?p=115#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>Definitely the former.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely the former.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marsh</title>
		<link>http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2009/07/atheism-101-pascals-wager/comment-page-1/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>Marsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/?p=115#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if I should be mad that my ignorance is public, or pleased that my company is wonderful...! haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I should be mad that my ignorance is public, or pleased that my company is wonderful&#8230;! haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

