The Health Ranger vs the Shorty Awards; electrohypersensitivity revisited, dinosaur names and flying to the moon using only water. Find out what the skeptics really believe in episode 14 of Skeptics with a K.
- No trackbacks yet.
Posted by Mike in Podcast, Skeptics with a K on January 28th, 2010
The Health Ranger vs the Shorty Awards; electrohypersensitivity revisited, dinosaur names and flying to the moon using only water. Find out what the skeptics really believe in episode 14 of Skeptics with a K.
10:23, Dinosaurs, Electrohypersensitivity, Pseudomedicine
This entry was posted on Thursday, January 28th, 2010 and is filed under Podcast, Skeptics with a K. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Copyright © 2009 The Merseyside Skeptics Society. Some rights reserved.
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.
theme by digitalnature | powered by WordPress | logo by TW!ST Digital Media
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) ^
#1 by Mike at January 28th, 2010
Good story on electrosensitivity:
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/01/15/electrosensitives-to.html
#2 by Trinoc at February 6th, 2010
I’d better point this out before any of the woomongers notice it (assuming, perhaps wrongly, that any of them will know enough chemistry to notice) … mercury in tooth fillings is not in the form of a compound, it is an amalgam. That is, it consists of a solution of other metals (like silver) in liquid mercury which has the property of hardening to a solid metal.
A small amount of mercury (and the other metals) does leech out and get ingested, but the general medical view is that this quantity is too small to cause noticeable harm. You’d possibly ingest more mercury by eating a tuna fish sandwich.
That said, I always hated the taste of mercury fillings, and the pain they produce when you accidentally chew on a piece of foil wrapping, so when my fillings needed replacement I forked out some extra cash to have them replaced with non-metallic ones.
You are also mistaken in saying that ingesting a mercury compound is less harmful than metallic mercury, and your analogy with sodium chloride is flawed. Both sodium and chloride ions are essential in the body, but mercury ions are poisonous. In fact, a mercury compound is probably more harmful than the equivalent amount of metallic mercury, since it may be more easily absorbed, whereas metallic mercury will mostly pass through the digestive system unchanged. This is particularly true if the metallic mercury is immobilised in a solid material like a tooth filling, so a swallowed filling may well be found a couple of days later in the bottom of the toilet bowl.
#3 by Mr Ashy at February 8th, 2010
Just listened to your talk about Mike Adams List o’ Lunacy and think that for his “Skeptics believe that the human body has no ability to defend itself against invading microorganism and that the only things that can save people from viral infections are vaccines.” You missed an obvious point. Not only do Skeptics believe that the immune system exists, they believe that this is how vaccines work! The whole basis of developing new vaccines and giving them out is that they stimulate the immune system against specific antigens the virus has.