<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>The Merseyside Skeptics Society &#187; equality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/tag/equality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk</link>
	<description>The official site of the Merseyside Skeptics Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.4" -->
	<itunes:summary>Skeptics with a K is the podcast for science, reason and critical thinking from the Merseyside Skeptics Society. We are a non-profit organisation dedicated to the promotion of scientific skepticism on Merseyside, around the UK and internationally.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Merseyside Skeptics Society</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/podcast/albumart.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Merseyside Skeptics Society</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>mike.hall@merseysideskeptics.org.uk</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>mike.hall@merseysideskeptics.org.uk (Merseyside Skeptics Society)</managingEditor>
	<itunes:subtitle>The podcast from the Merseyside Skeptics Society</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>skeptic, scepticism, skepticism, skeptics, science, critical thinking, atheist, atheism</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="Science &amp; Medicine" />
	<itunes:category text="Comedy" />
	<itunes:category text="Religion &amp; Spirituality" />
		<rawvoice:rating>TV-MA</rawvoice:rating>
		<item>
		<title>Another Rat-Zinger From The Pope</title>
		<link>http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2010/02/another-rat-zinger-from-the-pope/</link>
		<comments>http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2010/02/another-rat-zinger-from-the-pope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marsh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the pop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/?p=474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pope Benedict. Cardinal Ratzinger. Il Papa. God&#8217;s representative on Earth. Call him what you like, one thing remains clear: He&#8217;s an idiot. That much is indisputable. The only real question is what kind of an idiot is he? Is he an insane, people-hating idiot (see Mother Theresa)? Or is he perhaps a power-mad moron (I hear [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pope Benedict. Cardinal Ratzinger. Il Papa. God&#8217;s representative on Earth. Call him what you like, one thing remains clear: He&#8217;s an idiot. That much is indisputable. The only real question is what kind of an idiot is he? Is he an insane, people-hating idiot (see Mother Theresa)? Or is he perhaps a power-mad moron (I hear he&#8217;s amending the Ten Commandments to add an eleventh one &#8211; &#8220;Thou shalt stand on one leg when Ratzy says so&#8221;)? Or is he just a common-or-garden out-of-touch, ancienct, backward-thinking lunatic? The debate rages on. Here&#8217;s some fuel for the fire:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Pop Benedict attacks government over Equality Bill</strong></p>
<p>The Pope has urged Catholic bishops in England and Wales to fight the UK&#8217;s Equality Bill with &#8220;missionary zeal&#8221;. &#8211; Source: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8492597.stm" target="_blank">BBC Online</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Yep, the Holy One believes that a bill aimed at protecting people from discrimination based on sexuality and gender is an evil law that must be fought with the kind of zeal missionaries have. I&#8217;m not 100% sure what missionary zeal is &#8211; I think it&#8217;s where the zealot is on top and the infidel is underneath, thus allowing the zealot to look the infidel in the eyes while he fucks them (metaphorically speaking). I do think it worth pointing out that had a leading figure in the Muslim faith uttered the phrase &#8216;fight with missionary zeal&#8217; we&#8217;d be talking terrorism &#8211; but because the only people the Pope is condemning to death are countless Africans (more of that later) we see him as something of a weird but harmless old man. Go figure.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, the Pope has said the legislation &#8220;violates natural law&#8221; &#8211; a pretty clear reference to the fact that it would allow homosexuals more freedom from discrimination from, say, religious organisations. The very use of the phrase &#8216;violates natural law&#8217; is immensely telling, if you ask me &#8211; it&#8217;s so homophobic I&#8217;m surprised Jan Moir hasn&#8217;t had it tattooed across her forehead.<span id="more-474"></span></p>
<p>In a speech he made in Rome, Bene/Ratzy told the Catholic bishops of England and Wales:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Your country is well-known for its firm commitment to equality of opportunity for all members of society. Yet, as you have rightly pointed out, the effect of some of the legislation designed to achieve this goal has been to impose unjust limitations on the freedom of religious communities to act in accordance with their beliefs.</p>
<p>&#8220;In some respects it actually violates the natural law upon which the equality of all human beings is grounded and by which it is guaranteed.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The statements have rightly caused an uproar, as has the planned official 4-day visit the Holy Father intends to make to our unGodly and equality-seeking land. At a cost of £20million of tax-payers money. That&#8217;s £20million that could be better spent&#8230; on homeopathy, bankers&#8217; bonuses or MPs expenses, for example. It&#8217;s certainly £20million too much &#8211; a view shared by over 12,000 protesters, who&#8217;ve signed a petition to appeal to the Prime Minister to have the Pope&#8217;s club (worldwide Catholicism) to foot the bill, rather than the UK Government. The petition states:</p>
<blockquote><p>We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to ask the Catholic Church to pay for the proposed visit of the Pope to the UK and relieve the taxpayer of the estimated £20 million cost. We accept the right of the Pope to visit his followers in Britain, but public money would be better spent on hard-pressed schools, hospitals and social services which are facing cuts.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you agree with the cause, feel free to <a href="http://www.secularism.org.uk/petition-the-pm.html" target="_blank">sign the petition online</a>.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the first outrageous statement God&#8217;s representative on Earth has made of late. On March 17, 2009, Pope Benedict flew to Africa to visit Cameroon and Angola. During the flight, he was asked about the Catholic Church&#8217;s stance on AIDS in Africa.</p>
<p>Pope Benedict gave a lengthy response, detailing many of the Church’s humanitarian efforts to help people with AIDS in Africa.</p>
<blockquote><p>“I would say that this problem of AIDS cannot be overcome merely with money, necessary though it is. If there is no human dimension, if Africans do not help [by responsible behavior], the problem cannot be overcome by the distribution of prophylactics: on the contrary, they increase it.”</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s right &#8211; condoms help spread AIDS, says the leader of the Catholic Church.</p>
<p>Obviously, this stance from the head of the Catholic Church has been met with unprecedented levels of condemnation &#8211; most recently by Harry Knox, who serves on President Barack Obama’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. On Tuesday of last week Knox reiterated his stance that Pope Benedict XVI is “hurting people in the name of Jesus.”</p>
<blockquote><p>“The Pope’s statement that condoms don&#8217;t help control the spread of HIV, but rather condoms increase infection rates, is hurting people in the name of Jesus.</p>
<p>On a continent where millions of people are infected with HIV, it is morally reprehensible to spread such blatant falsehoods. The Pope’s rejection of scientifically proven prevention methods is forcing Catholics in Africa to choose between their faith and the health of their entire community.  Jesus was about helping the marginalized and downtrodden, not harming them further.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Condemning the third world to an AIDS epidemic isn&#8217;t the only blotch on the past record of <em>il Papa</em>. In May 2001, Ratzinger issued an order ensuring church investigations into child abuse by members of the clergy would be conducted in private. The letter from the then-Cardinal stated that the church has jurisdiction in cases where abuse has been &#8216;perpetrated with a minor by a cleric&#8217;, and stressed a policy of &#8216;strictest&#8217; secrecy in dealing with allegations of sexual abuse, threatening those who speak out with excommunication.</p>
<p>The order also calls for the victim to take an oath of secrecy at the time of making a complaint to Church officials.</p>
<p><strong>The victim</strong>.</p>
<p>Just to be completely clear, the current Pope specified that an abused child must take an oath of secrecy, lasting until 10 years after the child turns 18. Breach of that secrecy is met with excommunication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.merseysideskeptics.org.uk/2010/02/another-rat-zinger-from-the-pope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

